Jump to content



Photo
* * * * * 6 votes

Can my PC run GTA IV?


  • Please log in to reply
1189 replies to this topic

#1181 MrLlamaLlama

MrLlamaLlama

    Graphic Designer.

  • Super Mods
  • 4,821 posts

Posted 25 November 2012 - 01:05 AM

You should be able to record footage at 30fps on that setup. (As in, the video capture software could export 30 fps video, you'd probably get a few more ingame.) GTAIV has a pretty good suite of options to choose from so you can always play with the texture quality / shadows / reflections and density until it balances out nicely. On the rig in my signature, I can record IV on max settings to export at 30fps, with my actual game hitting about 40. Never tried recording at 60, but I imagine it'd chug a bit.

Just make sure all your drivers are right up to date and you're giving the thing enough space to vent the hot air out until you get to know what your system is capable of.

Posted Image


CoolerMaster HAFX Tower Case | XFX 850w Black Edition PSU | Asus CrossHair IV Formula Motherboard | AMD Phenom II x6 3.4 @ 3.7 Ghz + ThermalTake Frio HS/F | 8Gb Corsair Dominator GT | Nvidia/EVGA GTX470 1280Mb | 64GB Crucial RealSSD (os) | 2x 1TbSamsung Spinpoint F1


Need a quick GTA Fact Fix? - Grand Theft Wiki it!


#1182 MrLilmar

MrLilmar

    Nobody Special

  • Members
  • 2 posts
  • United States 

Posted 25 November 2012 - 04:12 AM

Are you sure I could record at 30 FPS? I was told on some different forums that it could run the game, but I would lag if I record, which I don't want because I want to make youtube videos.

#1183 MrLlamaLlama

MrLlamaLlama

    Graphic Designer.

  • Super Mods
  • 4,821 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 12:23 AM

Well, it's dependant largely upon the resolution you want to record at, if you're looking to record at 1080p then you might have issues. At 1280x720 you'd be better off and so on. it also depends on how high you want the settings to be when you record.

Posted Image


CoolerMaster HAFX Tower Case | XFX 850w Black Edition PSU | Asus CrossHair IV Formula Motherboard | AMD Phenom II x6 3.4 @ 3.7 Ghz + ThermalTake Frio HS/F | 8Gb Corsair Dominator GT | Nvidia/EVGA GTX470 1280Mb | 64GB Crucial RealSSD (os) | 2x 1TbSamsung Spinpoint F1


Need a quick GTA Fact Fix? - Grand Theft Wiki it!


#1184 BlackListedB

BlackListedB

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,641 posts

Posted 02 December 2012 - 09:47 PM

As I've said before, setting up a new Nehalem PC platform as well as a Penryn based Intel chipset gaming PC, I think with the best of the best offered as far back as 2007, the ground breaking nVidia GTX 8800 on upward, the 9700 Geforce or anything on the Radeon side above the 5 or 6 numeric range, with a memory bus over 128, if you're lucky there, should handle GTA fine in all these generations on the RAGE engine, what I just read is that GTA will not work well with SLI based GPUs, or I imagine Crossfire in lieu of nVidia hardware, so get yourself one really nice GPU graphics card, and make sure you have either Hyperthreading, Core2, Nehalem over that, or a quad core, even a discontinued board could support a top notch i7, and will endure as an investment for about 2 more years. Expect only two new processors within next year; Haswell Intel and Broadwell series code names.

As far as the YouTuber's using Fraps or some IN-GAME recorder, you're best option, and my own, is to forego that to record the output video from the card itself, connect to a recording device with the final signal you expect to see on your display, I don't know too many using HD as it's beyond my budget so far, but it shouldn't impact the software running, which is why I always go that route from a PC or console, in terms of recording something. People think recording to standard def from an output as I've done many times will degrade the content once uploaded, that was much more valid a complaint in the past as far as Google and YouTube having sync and resolution issues, of course, if you were on dial up and using YT uploads as well, which I've done too, your chances were REALLY hit and miss!!

Edited by BlackListedB, 02 December 2012 - 09:56 PM.


#1185 pcpmarch

pcpmarch

    Nobody Special

  • Members
  • 3 posts
  • No Flag 

Posted 20 February 2013 - 06:20 PM

These system requirements are from the year 2008, now its 2013. AMD is way cheaper than Intel, I got AMD FX 6100 processor at it can run GTA IV at awesome FPS. I think AMD is good for gamers. Use the saved cash on some awesome graphic card. Intel Core i5 is too costly. So with the saved money I buyed NVidia 4 GB DDR3 graphic card.



#1186 kiranta

kiranta

    Nobody Special

  • Members
  • 3 posts
  • India 

Posted 14 August 2014 - 09:44 AM

My specs (from DXDiag):

Operating System: Vista SP1
RAM: 3Gb
Processor: AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4000+ (2 CPUs), ~ 2.1GHz
Graphics: ATI Radeon HD4670 512Mb

Will it run playable?



#1187 Huckleberry Pie

Huckleberry Pie

    "There's always something,"

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,000 posts
  • Philippines 

Posted 15 August 2014 - 08:06 AM

Most likely on low settings, coupled with the 1.0.4.0 patch.


Posted Image

Ubisoft should take a look at this...
"We love Him because He first loved us." - 1 John 4:9-10


#1188 BlackListedB

BlackListedB

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,641 posts

Posted 16 February 2015 - 06:27 AM

Lemme bump an old thread, I reinstalled GTA IV on the Asus Republic of G (gangster or Gamer?!?) G73 and the old software header is Games for Windows Live along with companion Rockstar Social Club sign-on applet (offline portal to the online version)

 

As you know, this probably is unlikely to ever change now, but as it stands, mostly upsetting that the news sidebar and PC updates mentioned with it are still stuck in a time warp. While Rockstar constantly looks to improve GTA V because it bridges console changes nearly 10 years in the making, it is likely to have the most lavish attention paid from that of previous versions of Grand Theft Auto.

 

This tackles a few things, what updates seem to be missing, if any, from Rockstar for PC that perhaps the software is not showing up?

I've always been a bit upset that Rockstar seemingly felt it too much hassle to keep this interface active and updated, I'm sure at the time there were enough users who would appreciate a periodical update, I was expecting Rockstar to throw a bone to it's past dynamic online support of GTAs and other series games.

 

Also worth noting is that in my machine, both G73s used ATI HD5870, and Geforce 460m GTX, of which online gaming review benchmarks show that you can actually find differing results based on which game you play, the ever popular Call of Duty performed better on ATI's Radeon

 

Whereas GeForce nVidia performed better on others, providing stiff competition for each, and this being 2010 (the time of release for Intel's new Nehalem and the two GPU cards), it's interesting to note the release date and how it should mean support is there, (for GTA IV) but Crysis being as old as it is still required lower settings for smooth, higher frame rates.

 

I might have posted those findings before, but it's worth mentioning for first time portable game shoppers, a used gaming laptop can provide enough muscle and there is the find of GTX 560 nVidia being a possible upgrade (just shy of the 660 GTX recommended for GTA5 on PC)

Direct X 12 support for Windows 10 is something to keep in mind as well, as Windows 8 doesn't generate too much appeal for gaming, as does Windows Vista's introductory Direct X 10, quickly surpassed by DirectX11


Edited by BlackListedB, 16 February 2015 - 06:51 AM.


#1189 dissy524

dissy524

    Nobody Special

  • Members
  • 3 posts
  • No Flag 

Posted 10 November 2015 - 09:11 AM

I think the processor is too harsh.



#1190 rockstarrem

rockstarrem

    #SocialMediaPresence

  • Super Mods
  • 4,272 posts
  • United States 

Posted 10 November 2015 - 10:22 PM

I think the processor is too harsh.

What do you mean?






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users