Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

San Fierro Stories?


  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

#1 mvi

mvi

    Executioner

  • Elite Members
  • 1,801 posts
  • No Flag 

Posted 31 December 2005 - 10:01 PM

Not that I think it will be this, but no one has considerred that it could be one of the 3 cities on their own. I think SF would be pretty decent (no let's not get into a whole Los Santos gangs were great topic) it's underused in San Andreas and it's got a city I think no one knows that well unlike LS and LV, it has the largest airport, an aircraft carrier, a mountain and some excellent terrain.

#2 YoungFools

YoungFools

    GET OFF THE SOFA!

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 189 posts
  • Spain 

Posted 31 December 2005 - 11:22 PM

Sounds like a good idea, but I hope not...

#3 tommy vercetti guy

tommy vercetti guy

    Veteran

  • Banned
  • 1,781 posts
  • Canada 

Posted 01 January 2006 - 02:43 AM

No more old cities, I dont care of they change up a few stuff, I want a completely new city made from scratch.
Posted Image

#4 Dave1

Dave1

    Executioner

  • Elite Members
  • 1,041 posts
  • United States 

Posted 01 January 2006 - 03:25 AM

I hope to god they don't put Stories in the next title, nuff said.
Posted Image
Posted Image

#5 SoLo

SoLo

    Trickster

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 98 posts

Posted 01 January 2006 - 07:15 AM

i think they really shud do gta london for the psp, people wud be really hyped about it and psp sales wud go way up, if ya know what i mean
Posted Image

#6 C.O.D

C.O.D

    SFM Right-Hand

  • Elite Members
  • 858 posts
  • Indonesia 

Posted 01 January 2006 - 02:34 PM

Yeah, I would certainly want having San Fierro. I just don't know what Rockstar would do about the bridges that connect the city to the 2 other cities. Plus, the Golden Gant bridge that makes San Fierro special (for me) connects to the desert area, and it would be a trouble for R* to figure out what to do.
Either Removing the bridge, place a blockage/barricade (which makes the bridge a stinkipalopoo) on the bridges, or... Including some parts of the desert area.
Inspite all the poo, San Fierro Stories will make a decent game for the Portable Console...!

Posted Image





#7 mvi

mvi

    Executioner

  • Elite Members
  • 1,801 posts
  • No Flag 

Posted 01 January 2006 - 05:56 PM

Invisible reverse barriers wouldn't be too dodgy. Like there is on vice city and gta 3. [offtopic]Ddi you know that it is possible to walk on top of the pipe barrier in gta 3?

#8 Denise Robinson

Denise Robinson

    Pickpocket

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 35 posts

Posted 26 January 2006 - 05:08 PM

Im not sure if its just me, but I would hate a San Fierro stories. That had to be my least favourite island. So.. nothingy. Apart from Mt. Chilliad and Whetstone, is was boring. I would love a Las Venturas version though. That said, or an entirely new one!

Edited by Denise Robinson, 26 January 2006 - 05:08 PM.


#9 Righty

Righty

    *lurks*

  • Elite Members
  • 1,962 posts
  • United States 

Posted 26 January 2006 - 11:24 PM

I don't see San Fierro Stories. Actually, I don't think it will be xxxxx stories at all.

#10 ITBTD

ITBTD

    I LOVE MEERKATS!!!

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 124 posts
  • United States 

Posted 29 January 2006 - 01:42 AM

it should be san andreas stories.
Posted Image

#11 888ball

888ball

    Assassin

  • Elite Members
  • 744 posts
  •    England 

Posted 29 January 2006 - 10:23 AM

San Fierro was my favourite city in San Andreas, lots of nice stunts. Although I believe that its a little bit small. The cities of San Andreas are meant to be together, if only one was used for a game then it just wouldn't be right. Although im sure the UMD is not capable of holding San Andreas, so im anticipating Vice City.

#12 C.O.D

C.O.D

    SFM Right-Hand

  • Elite Members
  • 858 posts
  • Indonesia 

Posted 31 January 2006 - 10:35 AM

Yeah... Vice City could be a perfect game for a portable console.

Posted Image





#13 Taime

Taime

    Riff-Raff

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 212 posts
  • United Kingdom 

Posted 01 February 2006 - 03:28 AM

I prefered Los Santos out of all three since it had more detail into it, and San Fierro dosent have a mountain, the countryside has the mountain not SF no matter how nearby it was.
Posted Image

#14 Flegend

Flegend

    Shoplifter

  • Members
  • 8 posts

Posted 04 May 2006 - 11:25 AM

Although on SA San Fierro is my favourite island in San Andreas, i'm pretty sure that i'd get pretty bored, I think it does have to have more than one island... like the previous games they have had a few islands within the game! Just having one island/city, with no bridge to another island/city. I think it would be a waste of £35 to me!

Edited by Flegend, 04 May 2006 - 11:26 AM.

OMG! I'm such a flegend!

#15 Dazza

Dazza

    Life might get you down, so kill yourself!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,516 posts
  • Australia 

Posted 17 June 2006 - 06:22 AM

i think there gonna make the 3 islands[ls,lv and sf] on different discs and u have to beat one disc and then go onto the other one. How kool would that be.

[url="http://"z10.invisionfree.com/twilightintoxication""]Posted Image[/url]
Do not click the flames, it'll burn you.


#16 MrLanceVanceDance

MrLanceVanceDance

    Consigliere

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 777 posts
  • Australia 

Posted 13 January 2012 - 10:45 PM

I think Las Venturas is a better option. It has casinos, clubs, the Mafia, and it is a rich city.

#17 Meshy

Meshy

    Trickster

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 87 posts
  •    England 

Posted 04 March 2012 - 10:06 PM

Maybe.
But lets think about properly.
San Fierro is part of Los Santos so it'll basically not just SF.
But then we could see GTA SA in high def graphics but we'd know the map, so it would be kind of boring.
I mean we all know where everything is. No fun exploring the map then.

#18 MrLanceVanceDance

MrLanceVanceDance

    Consigliere

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 777 posts
  • Australia 

Posted 05 March 2012 - 06:23 AM

Maybe.
But lets think about properly.
San Fierro is part of Los Santos so it'll basically not just SF.
But then we could see GTA SA in high def graphics but we'd know the map, so it would be kind of boring.
I mean we all know where everything is. No fun exploring the map then.


San Fierro isn't part of Los Santos. It isn't anywhere near Los Santos. Those two cities are completely different from each other. Also, the map of GTA V Era Los Santos is going to be completely different to the GTA III Era Los Santos.

#19 Meshy

Meshy

    Trickster

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 87 posts
  •    England 

Posted 05 March 2012 - 04:21 PM

Fuck I got mixed up.
LOS Santos is the first country/island.
Basically I am saying it's part of SanAndreas so it would be called San Andreas stories.
Because San Fierro is part of San Andreas.

#20 MrLanceVanceDance

MrLanceVanceDance

    Consigliere

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 777 posts
  • Australia 

Posted 06 March 2012 - 05:44 AM

San Fierro Stories, if it does exist, will probably appear as a DLC to GTA V in the GTA V Era. Alternatively, it would be a sequel to GTA V.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users