Jump to content



Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Your GTA4 location ideas


  • Please log in to reply
886 replies to this topic

#21 ginger gibbon

ginger gibbon

    Nobody Special

  • Members
  • 1 posts

Posted 17 November 2005 - 01:31 PM

:bashhead:
I can't believe how obvious this is. I already pretty much know where the next GTA will be.

MAKE SURE YOU READ THIS

I ALREADY KNOW FOR A FACT WHERE ITS SET!!! (Well not for a fact but al the signs point towards it)

GTA 1

Level 1 - Liberty City
Level 2 - Vice city
Level 3 - San andreas

Then the expansion pack - GTA London

Not enough proof?

Football Factory
Setting: London
Produced by: Rockstar games
Genre: Football hooliganism

Hooliganism = gang fighting

The warriors
Genre: Gang fighting

How many of Rockstar games have had the key features added into GTA, whats that? ALL OF THEM!!!

Oh, and you might say they haven't patented the name, are you sure they didn't do that with GTA London 1969 and 1961???

GINGER_GIBBON5@HOTMAIL.COM

EMAIL ME AND TELL ME HOW GREAT I AM, WHICH I REALLY AM.

Edited by ginger gibbon, 17 November 2005 - 01:33 PM.


#22 Angusthe2nd

Angusthe2nd

    Vandal

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 19 posts

Posted 24 November 2005 - 12:00 AM

a remake of london 1969 guys thats all im saying

#23 KeaK

KeaK

    Shoplifter

  • Members
  • 5 posts
  • United States 

Posted 06 December 2005 - 04:10 AM

they should make the next GTa in tha Bay AreA!!!! nor cal baby!
that'l be sicc even tho they did put SF in SA it wasnt how we really live...it woulda been better if there were ppl at night doin sideshows nd all of the other stuff THA BAY DOES yadida?

#24 Spaz The Great

Spaz The Great

    Numba' one in the hood, G!

  • Elite Members
  • 9,926 posts

Posted 06 December 2005 - 06:34 AM

:bashhead:
I can't believe how obvious this is. I already pretty much know where the next GTA will be.

MAKE SURE YOU READ THIS

I ALREADY KNOW FOR A FACT WHERE ITS SET!!! (Well not for a fact but al the signs point towards it)

GTA 1

Level 1 - Liberty City
Level 2 - Vice city
Level 3 - San andreas

Then the expansion pack - GTA London

Not enough proof?

Football Factory
Setting: London
Produced by: Rockstar games
Genre: Football hooliganism

Hooliganism = gang fighting

The warriors
Genre: Gang fighting

How many of Rockstar games have had the key features added into GTA, whats that? ALL OF THEM!!!

Oh, and you might say they haven't patented the name, are you sure they didn't do that with GTA London 1969 and 1961???

GINGER_GIBBON5@HOTMAIL.COM

EMAIL ME AND TELL ME HOW GREAT I AM, WHICH I REALLY AM.


Ok, all the signs do not point towards London. What if they skip London and just start on GTA 2?

they should make the next GTa in tha Bay AreA!!!! nor cal baby!
that'l be sicc even tho they did put SF in SA it wasnt how we really live...it woulda been better if there were ppl at night doin sideshows nd all of the other stuff THA BAY DOES yadida?


I have no clue what the F*CK you just said.

Posted Image

There is no "freedom of speech" in forums, yes you can say what you want but in the end what the mods say gos. This is not a democracy.

lolz

#25 M@TT

M@TT

    Shoplifter

  • Members
  • 9 posts

Posted 06 December 2005 - 08:36 PM

London it be well cool like big ben and the busy streets at rush hour and the tube :clapping:

#26 Spaz The Great

Spaz The Great

    Numba' one in the hood, G!

  • Elite Members
  • 9,926 posts

Posted 06 December 2005 - 08:59 PM

London it be well cool like big ben and the busy streets at rush hour and the tube :clapping:


Posted Image

Might be a wise investment for you.

Posted Image

There is no "freedom of speech" in forums, yes you can say what you want but in the end what the mods say gos. This is not a democracy.

lolz

#27 Plo Koon

Plo Koon

    The Lurker of the Darkness

  • Banned
  • 478 posts
  • Canada 

Posted 06 December 2005 - 09:20 PM

they should make the next GTa in tha Bay AreA!!!! nor cal baby!
that'l be sicc even tho they did put SF in SA it wasnt how we really live...it woulda been better if there were ppl at night doin sideshows nd all of the other stuff THA BAY DOES yadida?


um idiot? um child? don't post if your spelling sucks. Did you know that man invented the dictionary or you know their is a such of a thing called a search engine where you can search the words that you can't spell.

And omg spaz English Grammer for Dummies LOL


Posted Image
Posted ImagePosted Image

Han Solo: Good against remotes is one thing. Good against the living, that's something else.


#28 M@TT

M@TT

    Shoplifter

  • Members
  • 9 posts

Posted 06 December 2005 - 09:55 PM

Posted Image

Might be a wise investment for you.


lol yer ill think about that :)

#29 KuT-ThroaT

KuT-ThroaT

    Vandal

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 16 posts
  • Australia 

Posted 10 December 2005 - 07:08 AM

As much as I would like GTA:4 to be in london or at least somewhere else besides america... I just can't see it happening. And even if they did have it in another country the main character/s would be American.

#30 mp3rp

mp3rp

    Shoplifter

  • Members
  • 5 posts

Posted 29 December 2005 - 04:55 PM

Queens NY :P
HWDP

Leone's own

AIM SN- mp3rp is anyone wants to IM and talk about GTA or PS1,PS2,PSP,GB,GBC,GBA, and Comp Games.

#31 the spooky lemon

the spooky lemon

    sexiest post ever --->

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 71 posts

Posted 03 January 2006 - 02:12 PM

why is everybody thinking that the next gta will be in a real place? gta 3 wasnt, vice city wasnt, san andreas wasnt so why would the next one be in a real place? :angry: but if it was set in a real place (which is very unlike rockstar) i would like london

#32 K-Dawgg007

K-Dawgg007

    Nobody Special

  • Members
  • 1 posts

Posted 03 January 2006 - 02:47 PM

VIVA LA MEXICO!!!!!!!!!!!

No, I'm not spanish, but I just think it would be cool if the next GTA was situated somewhere around the Mexican border. Drug running missions a plenty :cigar: !

#33 Slayer

Slayer

    You live only once

  • Elite Members
  • 2,287 posts
  • Croatia 

Posted 03 January 2006 - 07:58 PM

why is everybody thinking that the next gta will be in a real place? gta 3 wasnt, vice city wasnt, san andreas wasnt so why would the next one be in a real place? :angry: but if it was set in a real place (which is very unlike rockstar) i would like london


GTA III, VC & SA are real places, they just have another names, but the locations are the same.
GTA2 and GTA weren't real places, however.
<img src="http://img403.images.../cobsignv2.jpg" border="0" class="linked-sig-image" />
<div align="right"><img src="http://img257.images.../pervetnq6.jpg" border="0" class="linked-sig-image" /></div>
+5

#34 combatcommander

combatcommander

    im ok

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 72 posts

Posted 21 January 2006 - 10:43 AM

i think it should stay in the usa

#35 888ball

888ball

    Assassin

  • Elite Members
  • 744 posts
  •    England 

Posted 21 January 2006 - 02:03 PM

Well even though I know they wont have these locations:

Cuba, Colombia, Mexico City

I think somewhere around there would be great. It would make a refreshing change.

#36 bazz

bazz

    Nobody Special

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 15 February 2006 - 02:46 PM

I think Rockstar should set the next GTA in Europe, and if the rumour of 6 cities is true then I think the game should include a state/county from each of England, France, and Italy. Each state/county would include 2 cities. The English county would have 2 cities each based on London and Manchester, even though I'm from Newcastle and would love to see somewhere based on the place, I still don't think it would happen. Anyways, the French county would include 2 cities each based on Paris and Monte Carlo. And finally the Italian county would have 2 cities each based on Venice and Rome.

#37 Slayer

Slayer

    You live only once

  • Elite Members
  • 2,287 posts
  • Croatia 

Posted 15 February 2006 - 07:45 PM

I think Rockstar should set the next GTA in Europe, and if the rumour of 6 cities is true then I think the game should include a state/county from each of England, France, and Italy. Each state/county would include 2 cities. The English county would have 2 cities each based on London and Manchester, even though I'm from Newcastle and would love to see somewhere based on the place, I still don't think it would happen. Anyways, the French county would include 2 cities each based on Paris and Monte Carlo. And finally the Italian county would have 2 cities each based on Venice and Rome.


Get a google earth before you post something like that.

1. France, UK and Italy are not connected, so there should be somthing between France and Italy.
2. Monte Carlo is in Monaco, not France.
3. It's very possible that GTA4 will be set up in only one country, not a few.
4. Distance between those cities is more than 1000 km. Closer to 1550 km I think. What would be between them? How long would it take to make a map covering half a Europe?

Edited by Slayer, 15 February 2006 - 07:46 PM.

<img src="http://img403.images.../cobsignv2.jpg" border="0" class="linked-sig-image" />
<div align="right"><img src="http://img257.images.../pervetnq6.jpg" border="0" class="linked-sig-image" /></div>
+5

#38 Gerard

Gerard

    Underboss

  • Administrators
  • 3,873 posts

Posted 15 February 2006 - 11:53 PM

We all know Rockstar don't produce scale models of their locations, but they show all they need to in the space. I would appreciate loads more open space, and a big distance between two cities (which could be speeded up by rail or air travel, or bypassed in a taxi) would be great. France has some great scenery, so having miles and miles of this landscape, littered with villages and hamlets would be great fun.

We have no idea whether GTA4 is going to use an existing or a made-up city, but if it is real, picking and choosing them, regardless of their exact geographical location is probably whats going to happen. And slayer, I don't recall Las Vegas, LA and San Francisco being in the same state, do you? But they were ingame. Perhaps some cities could be picked and put in a corresponding quarter of the map. There were three well-defined sections of San Andreas, so I think we can expect there to be similar differences in GTA4.

In short, there is every possibility there will be recreated cities that aren't next to each other in real life, separated by different expanses of landscape and countryside. Loads of limestone scenery, with screes and potholes and streams would be great. I hope they develop the technology for having water flow downhill rather than stay at sea level all the time. I smell kayaking :D

Grand Theft Wiki Manager

And not a single fuck was given that day.


#39 Slayer

Slayer

    You live only once

  • Elite Members
  • 2,287 posts
  • Croatia 

Posted 16 February 2006 - 11:30 AM

We have no idea whether GTA4 is going to use an existing or a made-up city, but if it is real, picking and choosing them, regardless of their exact geographical location is probably whats going to happen. And slayer, I don't recall Las Vegas, LA and San Francisco being in the same state, do you? But they were ingame. Perhaps some cities could be picked and put in a corresponding quarter of the map. There were three well-defined sections of San Andreas, so I think we can expect there to be similar differences in GTA4.


Yeah, I know they aren't in the same state, but the idea of having Rome, Venice, Paris, London, Manchester and Monte Carlo is a bit too enthusiastic for me.
<img src="http://img403.images.../cobsignv2.jpg" border="0" class="linked-sig-image" />
<div align="right"><img src="http://img257.images.../pervetnq6.jpg" border="0" class="linked-sig-image" /></div>
+5

#40 bazz

bazz

    Nobody Special

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 17 February 2006 - 08:00 PM

(TO SLAYER) I know that England isnt connected to France and Italy, THAT IS WHY THEY HAVE THE FRIKKIN CHANNEL TUNNEL, and I also know that Monte Carlo is in monaco (I did actually take geography for GCSE), I meant that there should be 2 FRENCH cities and not 2 cities in France, and if they cant use different cities from different European countries, then what 6 cities from England are they gonna use? because even though there are many to choose from they are all very similar. The reason I chose London, Manchester, Paris, Monte Carlo, Rome and Venice, is because they all have their own famous identities.

London is famous for the houses of parliament, the royal family, traffic congestion, the cockney firms, and the football hooligans.

Manchester is popluar for the nightlife and the architecture.

Paris because it is the capital of France.

Monte Carlo because of the glamour, the sports cars, the yaught infested marinas, similar to miami (vice city).

Rome because of the old roman scenary (Vatican city), aswell as being linked with the mafia

Venice because of the canals (think tomb raider).




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users