Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

Syria under the Gun


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 BlackListedB

BlackListedB

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,555 posts

Posted 27 August 2013 - 01:16 AM

Chemical Weapons and US response in yet another bloody war, I tend to think along the lines that John McCain does, we've sat idly by for too long, but others say they'll also retaliate, and there's the most concern shown over response of whatever action we take from Russia and Iran. I still say, strategic assault on where chemical weapons can be located reasonable well off, without inflicting too much casualty, the main thing, but what if Assad were eliminated? Thoughts??


Edited by BlackListedB, 27 August 2013 - 01:18 AM.


#2 Scott.

Scott.

    I am God.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,460 posts

Posted 27 August 2013 - 02:21 PM

Probably be a good thing if Assad was elimated, evil fucker. Although wouldnt be good for USA-Russian relations!



#3 NSanityHD

NSanityHD

    Mai sottovalutare il potere del lato oscuro.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,270 posts

Posted 27 August 2013 - 04:46 PM

All wars need to stop, period. Countries need to stop fighting each other...especially with nuclear weapons. At this rate there's not going to be an "Earth" to live on in the next 6 years if it all continues, because (I wouldn't be surprised) it'll all be radioactive. :o

Edited by KyleIce45, 27 August 2013 - 04:46 PM.

Hello everyone! My name is Kyle.

DarkNight Gaming


#4 Scott.

Scott.

    I am God.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,460 posts

Posted 27 August 2013 - 06:16 PM

I've always said the human race would probably end up destroying itself - talk about intelligent spiecies eh! Wars wont ever stop as you have countries completley dominated by religion, people fighting over who believes in the true religion, all this bloodshed over some bullshit


  • NSanityHD likes this

#5 NSanityHD

NSanityHD

    Mai sottovalutare il potere del lato oscuro.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,270 posts

Posted 27 August 2013 - 07:39 PM

I've always said the human race would probably end up destroying itself - talk about intelligent spiecies eh! Wars wont ever stop as you have countries completley dominated by religion, people fighting over who believes in the true religion, all this bloodshed over some bullshit

True...it's pitiful.

Hello everyone! My name is Kyle.

DarkNight Gaming


#6 Trevor_Philips

Trevor_Philips

    Thug

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 271 posts
  • United States 

Posted 29 August 2013 - 10:07 AM

Countries need to stop fighting each other...especially with nuclear weapons. At this rate there's not going to be an "Earth" to live on in the next 6 years if it all continues, because (I wouldn't be surprised) it'll all be radioactive. :o

 

At what rate? Only two nuclear warheads have ever been used in anger and that was 68 years ago earlier this month. It'll take a hell of a lot longer than 6 years to radiate the entire planet out of habitability at that rate. No one is randomly slinging nukes around just for lulz.

 

Way to be melodramatic. :rolleyes:



#7 NSanityHD

NSanityHD

    Mai sottovalutare il potere del lato oscuro.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,270 posts

Posted 29 August 2013 - 10:19 PM

 

Countries need to stop fighting each other...especially with nuclear weapons. At this rate there's not going to be an "Earth" to live on in the next 6 years if it all continues, because (I wouldn't be surprised) it'll all be radioactive. :o

 

At what rate? Only two nuclear warheads have ever been used in anger and that was 68 years ago earlier this month. It'll take a hell of a lot longer than 6 years to radiate the entire planet out of habitability at that rate. No one is randomly slinging nukes around just for lulz.

 

Way to be melodramatic. :rolleyes:

 

Still, no offense toward the US or anything Spartan, but the US military seem to think nuclear warheads solve everything. :erm:


Edited by KyleIce45, 29 August 2013 - 10:20 PM.

Hello everyone! My name is Kyle.

DarkNight Gaming


#8 Sherman

Sherman

    Capo

  • Super Mods
  • 6,923 posts

Posted 29 August 2013 - 10:58 PM

It's getting heated. Plus Russia and China are complicating things with the U.N. and the U.S. .. I'm not too sure what to think. It's still unclear who or why the chemicals were set off, huh?



#9 BlackListedB

BlackListedB

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,555 posts

Posted 31 August 2013 - 05:18 AM

Truly, if everyone who supposedly worships a deity representing all that's good, love, caring, compassion, then go out and kill and wage endless campaigns of hatred, your doctrine is fundamentally FLAWED. Get A Life, wage your combats and contests in video games, as we do, no one need die or get hurt in the real world, the whole point of these games me thinks!



#10 Scott.

Scott.

    I am God.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,460 posts

Posted 10 September 2013 - 08:37 AM

If it isnt handled delicately by both sides, something will kick off pretty soon. Putin isnt being the most diplomatic at the moment which doesnt help.



#11 Sherman

Sherman

    Capo

  • Super Mods
  • 6,923 posts

Posted 10 September 2013 - 11:27 AM

I like his idea.. Syria giving up the chemicals to international law and having them properly destroyed. But really, who knows if it's a time ploy or the real deal.



#12 NSanityHD

NSanityHD

    Mai sottovalutare il potere del lato oscuro.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,270 posts

Posted 10 September 2013 - 01:02 PM

In all honesty, I wouldn't be surprised if WW3 starts up in the next couple of years. :L


Hello everyone! My name is Kyle.

DarkNight Gaming


#13 BlackListedB

BlackListedB

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,555 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 08:43 AM

In large part I'm checking in with CNN more then other sources for updates on this debate, but it really seems to be moving in REAL motion not involving force, that that threat is debatable and in question as a needed reinforcement.

 

According to 'talking heads', Americans don't want any action without an end-game spelled out, what is the ultimate outcome and desired effect, I see it purely as eliminating chemical weapons, and people in their right mind still lose sight of this simple answer.

 

It's somewhat maddening to see them argue so adamantly that there should be a 'hands off' policy, but the US is involved in World Affairs, not so far as being the World's Police man, but it's something that's not going to revert to isolationism. If people were on board for that idea, Ron Paul would have been in the contest to be our President as he seemed to adopt that, and people called out his foreign policy lack-thereof


Edited by BlackListedB, 13 September 2013 - 08:46 AM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users