Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

Los Santos confirmed - what about SF and LV?


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 TheGunslinger

TheGunslinger

    When in doubt, get the shotgun out.

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 217 posts
  • Norway 

Posted 02 November 2011 - 04:55 PM

If you have watched the trailer you will know that Los Santos will be a location in GTAV. But what of San Fierro and Las Venturas? Do you think these cities will also be included so to make up the whole state of San Andreas?

Personally i would love to see an new San Fierro and Las Venturas. I also hope the small country towns in between make a return too. So many questions, not enough answers lol.

Posted Image


#2 Gerard

Gerard

    Underboss

  • Administrators
  • 3,873 posts

Posted 02 November 2011 - 05:23 PM

I think it'd be fun to see those cities appear in DLC. At least that's more than a storyline (TLAD/BOGT) and would be awesome enough for everyone to buy. AND it means the first release has more time to be perfected, instead of trying to rush 2 more cities, or just delaying it more and more.

Grand Theft Wiki Manager

And not a single fuck was given that day.


#3 Dirty Harry

Dirty Harry

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,736 posts
  • No Flag 

Posted 02 November 2011 - 05:26 PM

They have to include the 2 other cities. I mean, it could elevate the game to the point of perfection? Sure, maybe it should be done in DLC, but still, it's gotta happen.

Cruising in the desert with a plane or car, riding through the hills was some of the biggest fun I had playing a game.

#4 TrialByFire

TrialByFire

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,231 posts

Posted 02 November 2011 - 05:30 PM

I think it'd be fun to see those cities appear in DLC. At least that's more than a storyline (TLAD/BOGT) and would be awesome enough for everyone to buy. AND it means the first release has more time to be perfected, instead of trying to rush 2 more cities, or just delaying it more and more.


This sounds like an amazing idea.

In GTA V they could do it so you just get Los Santos to play around in, then in the first DLC you get Los Santos, the badlands and San Fierro and then in the final DLC you get access all areas.

I have no problem with people believing what they want, until they think it's right to try and change what I believe.

I'm so happy, I could shit a rainbow!


#5 TUN3R

TUN3R

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,569 posts

Posted 02 November 2011 - 05:51 PM

Gerard: You do realize the game will probably have bout 50 GB right? Whole cities as DLC... don't know.

#6 Spaz The Great

Spaz The Great

    Numba' one in the hood, G!

  • Elite Members
  • 9,926 posts

Posted 02 November 2011 - 06:08 PM

Gerard: You do realize the game will probably have bout 50 GB right? Whole cities as DLC... don't know.


It would be inconvenient for those who don't have ridiculous internet speeds. Of course, most of those people would probably just be like, "Oh well, noob get a better internet connection!!!"

I think DLC is novelty, personally. Just give me the whole game when I drop 60-70 dollars on it.

Posted Image

There is no "freedom of speech" in forums, yes you can say what you want but in the end what the mods say gos. This is not a democracy.

lolz

#7 Chris

Chris

    Limbal Rings

  • Administrators
  • 10,923 posts

Posted 02 November 2011 - 06:48 PM

You guys all forgetting the GTA IV DLCs were released on disc as well as download?

I think it's plausible. But I still think we might see all of San Andreas in the game from the start. If size is an issue (for 360 and PC) then multiple discs (like LA Noire) can get around that. Obviously PS3 has bluray so I don't think it'll be an issue there.

#8 TUN3R

TUN3R

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,569 posts

Posted 02 November 2011 - 06:57 PM

You guys all forgetting the GTA IV DLCs were released on disc as well as download?

I think it's plausible. But I still think we might see all of San Andreas in the game from the start. If size is an issue (for 360 and PC) then multiple discs (like LA Noire) can get around that. Obviously PS3 has bluray so I don't think it'll be an issue there.


Yeah with separate content... just like buying 2 separate demos but with the whole map.

#9 kriss3d

kriss3d

    Scam Artist

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 56 posts

Posted 02 November 2011 - 07:21 PM

Uhmm last thing i remember was DLC for GTA franchise is for PS3 only.. I never got the chance to play BOGT or anything else. By the way.. I thought the city resembled Vice city.. Los Santos.. Which part is that supposed to be ( yeah sorry but its a long time since i played the older Gta games so please bring me up to speed on locations.. Ive hard los santos quite a few times in here but i cant remember which game or where its supposed to be (or what real city its supposed to be)

#10 Dirty Harry

Dirty Harry

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,736 posts
  • No Flag 

Posted 02 November 2011 - 08:08 PM

I'm prety sure the DLC was also available for the 360 bro.

Los Santos is in San Andreas, and it's a version of Los Angeles.

#11 TheGunslinger

TheGunslinger

    When in doubt, get the shotgun out.

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 217 posts
  • Norway 

Posted 02 November 2011 - 08:31 PM

You guys all forgetting the GTA IV DLCs were released on disc as well as download?

I think it's plausible. But I still think we might see all of San Andreas in the game from the start. If size is an issue (for 360 and PC) then multiple discs (like LA Noire) can get around that. Obviously PS3 has bluray so I don't think it'll be an issue there.


Posted Image

:dribble:

If this screenshot is anything to go by the map is going to be fecking huge. I dont think size will be an issue though, i mean they managed to fit the Just Cause 2 map onto one disk.

Posted Image


#12 AndrewW91

AndrewW91

    Shoplifter

  • Members
  • 9 posts
  • United States 

Posted 02 November 2011 - 11:57 PM

If it were just Los Santos, I don't think the license plates would say "San Andreas".
Wasn't the mountain right outside of San Fierro? It's been ages since I've played San Andreas. Then again, it's going to be a completely different looking San Andreas than the one we've seen. So the mountain doesn't mean anything just yet. We'll probably know with the next trailer.

#13 kriss3d

kriss3d

    Scam Artist

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 56 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 08:57 AM

Oh ok so DLC was out for xbox and ps3.. well my point is that it did never get released for PC which is sad. Anyway with Los Santos.. So basicly GTA5 is San andreas though moved slightly so its in Los Santos now ? Which means San Andreas could be on the map ?? I cant remember los santos at all from SA.. Except a radiostation with that name.. Did we get to actually go to Los Santos in SA ?? San Fierro was the hillbilly contryside right ?

#14 Blur

Blur

    Headhunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 517 posts
  • United States 

Posted 03 November 2011 - 10:00 AM

Posted Image

Yes, Los Santos was the first city you could access. IMO it Rockstar wouldn't use a physical barrier to prevent us from going any further. The hillbilly countryside was above Los Santos. San Andreas wouldn't be complete without Las Venturas, the desert, and San Fiero huge bay area. I 100% believe these two cities will be in the final game.

#15 Dmac

Dmac

    Made Man

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 862 posts
  • Australia 

Posted 03 November 2011 - 11:01 AM

I think it could be all of San Andreas, only because of the number plates saying San Andreas, and the fact the trailer showed us Los Santos and parts of San Fierro (eg Mt Chilliad)

PXhBw.png

www.dmac.pw


#16 Gerard

Gerard

    Underboss

  • Administrators
  • 3,873 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 03:18 PM

For those who haven't heard, it's officially just Los Santos now; with the mountains/countryside/desert surrounding it.

DLC possibility is still there.

Grand Theft Wiki Manager

And not a single fuck was given that day.


#17 TUN3R

TUN3R

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,569 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 03:23 PM

If it were just Los Santos, I don't think the license plates would say "San Andreas".
Wasn't the mountain right outside of San Fierro? It's been ages since I've played San Andreas. Then again, it's going to be a completely different looking San Andreas than the one we've seen. So the mountain doesn't mean anything just yet. We'll probably know with the next trailer.


Los Angeles plates say California don't they?

#18 Artur

Artur

    I-E-A-I-A-I-O

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,835 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 07:25 PM

Oh ok so DLC was out for xbox and ps3.. well my point is that it did never get released for PC which is sad. Anyway with Los Santos.. So basicly GTA5 is San andreas though moved slightly so its in Los Santos now ? Which means San Andreas could be on the map ?? I cant remember los santos at all from SA.. Except a radiostation with that name.. Did we get to actually go to Los Santos in SA ?? San Fierro was the hillbilly contryside right ?

The DLC did get released for PC as well actually. As for San Andreas you got access to each city in the following order Los Santos (Los Angeles), San Fierro (San Francisco) and Las Venturas (Las Vegas). San Andreas (California) is the state that those cities are in, so based on the official R* announcement the game is set in Los Santos with the surrouding countryside, mountains and beaches. Basically the bottom half of the old SA map that totalaccessGTA posted. However, if they are re-imagining the city, they might change out the layout and geography just as MLL said in another thread.

Posted Image

Courtesy of TM!


#19 Dmac

Dmac

    Made Man

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 862 posts
  • Australia 

Posted 04 November 2011 - 02:40 AM

Despite the fact it's just Los Santos, I have a feeling it's still going to be massive. The only reason I say that is because of what R* said;

"Developed by series creator Rockstar North, Grand Theft Auto V heads to the city of Los Santos and surrounding hills, countryside and beaches in the largest and most ambitious game Rockstar has yet created."

Edited by Dmac, 04 November 2011 - 02:41 AM.

PXhBw.png

www.dmac.pw


#20 Spaz The Great

Spaz The Great

    Numba' one in the hood, G!

  • Elite Members
  • 9,926 posts

Posted 06 November 2011 - 08:49 PM


Oh ok so DLC was out for xbox and ps3.. well my point is that it did never get released for PC which is sad. Anyway with Los Santos.. So basicly GTA5 is San andreas though moved slightly so its in Los Santos now ? Which means San Andreas could be on the map ?? I cant remember los santos at all from SA.. Except a radiostation with that name.. Did we get to actually go to Los Santos in SA ?? San Fierro was the hillbilly contryside right ?

The DLC did get released for PC as well actually. As for San Andreas you got access to each city in the following order Los Santos (Los Angeles), San Fierro (San Francisco) and Las Venturas (Las Vegas). San Andreas (California) is the state that those cities are in, so based on the official R* announcement the game is set in Los Santos with the surrouding countryside, mountains and beaches. Basically the bottom half of the old SA map that totalaccessGTA posted. However, if they are re-imagining the city, they might change out the layout and geography just as MLL said in another thread.


Las Vegas isn't in Cali, it's in Nevada.

Posted Image

There is no "freedom of speech" in forums, yes you can say what you want but in the end what the mods say gos. This is not a democracy.

lolz




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users