Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

First GTA V trailer is here!


  • Please log in to reply
216 replies to this topic

#181 BlackListedB

BlackListedB

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,445 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 06:44 AM

According to rather good sources Ned Luke is the VOICE of the main character we presume. As far as Red Dead not being graphically superior?? Get your TV replaced, son! In HD 720 and 1080 it looks flippin' amazing!!
The teams are sharing their input on the RAGE Euphoria engine because it pays to work on their games that way. Ever since the Midnight Club programmers' wives went to leak a story about the demands placed on workers, we've had ideas that the work load amongst Rockstar Games development staff is start / stop in nature, that they don't work on one item of business till it comes to fruition.

I'd thought I mentioned this prior, If you keep up with the news reports on Rockstar and interviews... This report came out of the Rockstar San Diego camp, but there's proof that Rockstar Games Production credits are popping up ever more increasingly, suggests the shared development knowledge.

As for detail, I refer mostly to the mountain scene for comparison to RDR, where you can obviously see leaves and bushes blowing around. In the City scene beneath the overpass, look at the ground, and notice bugs and/or debris that's moving, that's the added details we can expect

#182 Husky

Husky

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,441 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 05:06 PM

Anything with a blurred screen is fake, I doubt that is the map and real info. But in some way if it is - that's jaw dropping amazing. I hope it doesn't turn out into a glitchy headache like L.A. Noire. Also, why is VineWood out side of Los Santos? There in the same place...

Edited by Husky, 22 November 2011 - 05:07 PM.

Posted Image


#183 TUN3R

TUN3R

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,569 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 05:14 PM

Anything with a blurred screen is fake, I doubt that is the map and real info. But in some way if it is - that's jaw dropping amazing. I hope it doesn't turn out into a glitchy headache like L.A. Noire. Also, why is VineWood out side of Los Santos? There in the same place...


Hollywood / Vinewood is at the edge of LA / LS far as I know.

#184 Jezz Torrent

Jezz Torrent

    Headhunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 512 posts
  • United States 

Posted 22 November 2011 - 08:56 PM


Anything with a blurred screen is fake, I doubt that is the map and real info. But in some way if it is - that's jaw dropping amazing. I hope it doesn't turn out into a glitchy headache like L.A. Noire. Also, why is VineWood out side of Los Santos? There in the same place...


Hollywood / Vinewood is at the edge of LA / LS far as I know.

Yeah i think it is too. its almost kind of separate from the city

#185 BlackListedB

BlackListedB

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,445 posts

Posted 23 November 2011 - 06:17 AM

Vinewood was an early clue/guess/suggestion over at GTAForums. I latched on to that and when I saw Vinewood in the trailer, it literally Sealed The Deal! Not only that, but the San Andreas connection was clear after the beach scene, which to me seemed like Vice City, obviously... Since the Life Guard houses first showed on the VC beaches.

In term of the GTA realm, I sincerely believe that Los Santos as we've seen for GTA 5, won't be the same as San Andreas. Most of us believe there will be changes as an exact map would be unrepresentative of the Rockstar Worlds evolving.
I believe they chose some of SA for the sake of fans, and probably based on time required to make a new game in a time frame suitable

Edited by BlackListedB, 23 November 2011 - 06:25 AM.


#186 amazingdude

amazingdude

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,130 posts
  • No Flag 

Posted 23 November 2011 - 11:22 AM

Vinewood and richman is the city limit of LS dudes just like B.hills and Hollywood hills in LA :P

#187 TUN3R

TUN3R

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,569 posts

Posted 23 November 2011 - 11:59 AM

Vinewood and richman is the city limit of LS dudes just like B.hills and Hollywood hills in LA :P


Yeah thought so too.

#188 Red_Squirrel_UK

Red_Squirrel_UK

    Thug

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 263 posts
  •    England 

Posted 23 November 2011 - 06:59 PM

So had it been comfirmed that this game isn't going to include the ENTIRE san an map?

#189 amazingdude

amazingdude

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,130 posts
  • No Flag 

Posted 23 November 2011 - 11:52 PM

Nothing has been confirmed yet.

#190 TUN3R

TUN3R

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,569 posts

Posted 24 November 2011 - 02:03 PM

Nothing has been confirmed yet.


It has. It will be Los Santons + surroundings, but no LV or SF. Don't know about desert but I don't think LA has any...

#191 amazingdude

amazingdude

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,130 posts
  • No Flag 

Posted 24 November 2011 - 05:13 PM

Shit! I thought there was a SF lol

#192 Gerard

Gerard

    Underboss

  • Administrators
  • 3,873 posts

Posted 25 November 2011 - 07:05 AM

In the announcement, rockstar said it was LS + surrounding countryside. That doesn't mean they can't add in SF or LV at a later date as DLC (doesn't mean they will, either).

Grand Theft Wiki Manager

And not a single fuck was given that day.


#193 TUN3R

TUN3R

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,569 posts

Posted 25 November 2011 - 01:09 PM

In the announcement, rockstar said it was LS + surrounding countryside. That doesn't mean they can't add in SF or LV at a later date as DLC (doesn't mean they will, either).


It means they most likely won't. Have you ever seen a DLC for a game that added 2/3 of the game's current map? I mean we're talking at least 10 - 20 GB on PC and 5 - 10 on consoles.

#194 Gerard

Gerard

    Underboss

  • Administrators
  • 3,873 posts

Posted 25 November 2011 - 11:11 PM

Rockstar are always pushing the boundaries. TLAD+BOGT added vehicles, missions, buildings, characters, storylines, radio stations - why not map areas too?

I wouldn't expect a whole city to be a cheap downloadable addon, but more like a new game that physically interlinks with the previous game - so you can access both areas.

I'm sure they can get around the technical issues with that and make it work.

Grand Theft Wiki Manager

And not a single fuck was given that day.


#195 Bulletproofboy

Bulletproofboy

    Hired Muscle

  • Restricted
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 473 posts

Posted 25 November 2011 - 11:17 PM

Yeah I heard it was Los Santos too...

#196 Husky

Husky

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,441 posts

Posted 26 November 2011 - 03:14 PM

Rockstar has included map areas before in Midnight Club Los Angeles. Also with GTAV looking like RDD I'm guessing that they will add a new storyline with SF, or LV and release it in a Variety pack.

Posted Image


#197 amazingdude

amazingdude

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,130 posts
  • No Flag 

Posted 26 November 2011 - 04:55 PM

I think there would be a 2nd game in the GTA V era after this LS they may include doing the second and third game in SF and LV.

#198 TUN3R

TUN3R

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,569 posts

Posted 26 November 2011 - 10:12 PM

I think there would be a 2nd game in the GTA V era after this LS they may include doing the second and third game in SF and LV.


GTA IV era, V being the 2nd...

Don't know, SF and LV DLC's coming out at all seem to me like PS3 Emulators coming out over night...

#199 Jezz Torrent

Jezz Torrent

    Headhunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 512 posts
  • United States 

Posted 28 November 2011 - 08:25 PM

I keep wondering when new info from rockstar will come out. its been almost a month since the trailer...

#200 Spaz The Great

Spaz The Great

    Numba' one in the hood, G!

  • Elite Members
  • 9,926 posts

Posted 28 November 2011 - 10:02 PM

They're going to let us stew over it a bit, I'd guess. Probably let it go long enough for us to get angry, then give us some more info.

Posted Image

There is no "freedom of speech" in forums, yes you can say what you want but in the end what the mods say gos. This is not a democracy.

lolz




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users