Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

GTA 5?


  • Please log in to reply
53 replies to this topic

#41 Lutten

Lutten

    Spectrum

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 238 posts
  • India 

Posted 23 October 2011 - 05:47 AM

Yeah GTA V is perfect and we need not argue on it.

#42 TUN3R

TUN3R

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,569 posts

Posted 23 October 2011 - 09:32 AM

GTA III Era:

GTA III
GTA Vice City
GTA San Andreas
GTA Liberty City Stories
GTA Vice City Stories

-.-'

GTA Advance runs somewhat in parallel I think...

#43 amazingdude

amazingdude

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,130 posts
  • No Flag 

Posted 23 October 2011 - 11:19 AM

Yes GTA advance comes under the GTA III era

#44 Gerard

Gerard

    Underboss

  • Administrators
  • 3,873 posts

Posted 24 October 2011 - 01:47 AM

The next GTA game could be virtually anything.

It could be GTA V. Or it could be a new game in the GTA IV era, with related graphics/features/characters (like VC/SA were related to GTA III)

It could be set in Vice City or San Andreas, or even London or Anywhere City. Or it could be somewhere new entirely.

All we have to go on are hints and clues built into GTA IV, some of which will be true, some of which will just be coincidences. From these, most of the signs point to it being in VC, SA or perhaps somewhere in Europe (London/Paris).

I personally think it's most likely to be a new game in the GTA IV era, set in VC, SA or London. I don't think we'll see GTA V until the next generation of consoles (2013-ish)

Grand Theft Wiki Manager

And not a single fuck was given that day.


#45 TUN3R

TUN3R

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,569 posts

Posted 24 October 2011 - 08:35 AM

Were the next gen disk scratchers even announced? Cause I think the earliest time we'll see a new GTA game is 2017...

Assuming we don't all die in 2012...

#46 Gerard

Gerard

    Underboss

  • Administrators
  • 3,873 posts

Posted 24 October 2011 - 08:46 AM

Were the next gen disk scratchers even announced? Cause I think the earliest time we'll see a new GTA game is 2017...

The Wii U is being pitched as the first next-gen console (along with the 3DS and PS Vita), but tbh I regard Kinect to be this generation too.

It'll be a couple of years before we start seeing any signs of a brand new generation of consoles (New Xbox/PS3). That's when I think we'll get a new GTA.

Grand Theft Wiki Manager

And not a single fuck was given that day.


#47 TUN3R

TUN3R

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,569 posts

Posted 24 October 2011 - 08:53 AM

And of course releasing a new game on PC 1st instead of waiting the slow ass consoles to catch up is out of the question :P

#48 amazingdude

amazingdude

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,130 posts
  • No Flag 

Posted 24 October 2011 - 09:33 AM

It is a possibility that the new GTA game will fall under GTA IV. We all have to wait a year or more if we want to get GTA V. :(

#49 TUN3R

TUN3R

    Executioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,569 posts

Posted 24 October 2011 - 10:56 AM

It is a possibility that the new GTA game will fall under GTA IV. We all have to wait a year or more if we want to get GTA V. :(


It's most likely, actually -.-

Edited by TUN3R, 24 October 2011 - 10:57 AM.


#50 MrLanceVanceDance

MrLanceVanceDance

    Consigliere

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 777 posts
  • Australia 

Posted 11 January 2012 - 01:22 AM

The next Grand Theft Auto game is called "Grand Theft Auto V". It is set in a completely redesigned, modern day Los Santos. Grand Theft Auto V will be released in either 2012 and (provided the world doesn't end) 2013. It will be the start of a new storyline/timeline.

#51 Gerard

Gerard

    Underboss

  • Administrators
  • 3,873 posts

Posted 11 January 2012 - 06:42 PM

The next Grand Theft Auto game is called "Grand Theft Auto V". It is set in a completely redesigned, modern day Los Santos. Grand Theft Auto V will be released in either 2012 and (provided the world doesn't end) 2013. It will be the start of a new storyline/timeline.


Look at the posts date ffs. This was from BEFORE the trailer was announced. Of course they know that now.

Grand Theft Wiki Manager

And not a single fuck was given that day.


#52 MrLanceVanceDance

MrLanceVanceDance

    Consigliere

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 777 posts
  • Australia 

Posted 12 January 2012 - 12:47 AM

My apologies for any offence caused. I was just updating the page, in case somebody chooses to continue this old topic.

#53 Gerard

Gerard

    Underboss

  • Administrators
  • 3,873 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 01:26 AM

My apologies for any offence caused. I was just updating the page, in case somebody chooses to continue this old topic.

Thats not how forums work - this isn't a wiki where we keep every page updated, it's a series of discussions or questions/answers. Since the information is all over these forums (and the web), we assume they know. If someone still has a question, they'll ask it now.

To explain why: bumping ancient topics like this back up to the top of the lists (where the personal originally asking the question might not even be active anymore) makes more relevant & useful topics disappear down on the page or off the front page, and it makes this forum an inactive hive of old questions with new questions being unanswered.

Remember forums are navigated by recent posts in active topics, not like a wiki where it's browsed based on subject and links. The most recently posted topics get ALL the attention, which works for question/answers and discussions like this.

Grand Theft Wiki Manager

And not a single fuck was given that day.


#54 MrLanceVanceDance

MrLanceVanceDance

    Consigliere

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 777 posts
  • Australia 

Posted 13 January 2012 - 02:44 AM

I see. Thanks for clearing that up Gerard.

Edited by MrLanceVanceDance, 13 January 2012 - 02:44 AM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users