GDT version 1.0
#221
Posted 21 August 2007 - 11:48 PM
They run 11/1 compression on 89 octane pumpgas. The last one I had made close to 400 HP, had it in a '70 Galaxie. I miss
that car, it was stolen & scrapped by retards.

If you love something, set it free. If it comes back, it's meant to be.
If not, point & laugh when it flies into a woodchipper.
#222
Posted 21 August 2007 - 11:50 PM
edit: Ran 11.83 @ 116... dunno power numbers, but that's good for a car that's still streetable / a DD.
#223
Posted 22 August 2007 - 12:06 AM

If you love something, set it free. If it comes back, it's meant to be.
If not, point & laugh when it flies into a woodchipper.
#224
Posted 25 August 2007 - 05:36 AM
I've seen under the hood of a couple Windstars, Looks like a Taurus drive train. Get one w/ a 3.8 & you could probably use
a supercharger kit from a 'Stang.
400 HP mini-van. That's just wrong.
Windstar is kinda based off of the Taurus. So yes, same engine and transaxles. The only thing is the Split Port Induction intake manifold won't fit under the hood of a 96-07 Taurus
#225
Posted 25 August 2007 - 05:39 AM
I've seen under the hood of a couple Windstars, Looks like a Taurus drive train. Get one w/ a 3.8 & you could probably use
a supercharger kit from a 'Stang.
400 HP mini-van. That's just wrong.
Windstar is kinda based off of the Taurus. So yes, same engine and transaxles. The only thing is the Split Port Induction intake manifold won't fit under the hood of a 96-07 Taurus
I've seen one of those with dual exhuast outlets before. Looked like flowmasters, ew.
#226
Posted 25 August 2007 - 09:30 PM
And I'm having withdrawal from driving. I haven't actually driven anywhere since last wednesday
#227
Posted 26 August 2007 - 07:00 PM
Windstar is kinda based off of the Taurus. So yes, same engine and transaxles. The only thing is the Split Port Induction intake manifold won't fit under the hood of a 96-07 Taurus
Unless you want to chop up your hood.
If you're talking 3.8, the intake off a '00 Mustang should work nicely. Saw one recently w/ the top half of the manifold
off, looked like one of the wild set-ups from the '50s or early '60s for 6 2-bbl carbs.
For myself, I prefer the 3.0 in a Taurus. Surprisingly powerful & a LOT more room to work on them on the few occasions
they need it. This is from putting a transaxle in a 3.8 Taurus.

If you love something, set it free. If it comes back, it's meant to be.
If not, point & laugh when it flies into a woodchipper.
#228
Posted 27 August 2007 - 12:05 PM
After I changed the plugs the car wouldn't run for some reason. Apparently I forgot that I unhooked the IAC and TPS.
#229
Posted 28 August 2007 - 07:02 AM
I presume you got it running?

If you love something, set it free. If it comes back, it's meant to be.
If not, point & laugh when it flies into a woodchipper.
#230
Posted 30 August 2007 - 02:29 AM
Would it be the 3.1 lumina? I love the sound the 3.1 makes.
#231
Posted 15 September 2007 - 08:36 PM
To all those who still think the Bugatti Veyron is the fastest production car, think again. The SSC Aero broke the record 2 days ago at a blazing 255.83 MPH!
TEC 9, on Aug 28 2006, 08:48 PM, said:
#232
Posted 16 September 2007 - 12:02 AM
#233
Posted 16 September 2007 - 03:11 AM

Signature Made By MrLlamaLlama
I LOVE HIP HOP, AUSSIE HIP HOP, RAP, GANGSTA RAP, UK RAP, AND LATINO RAP.
BUT I HATE CRUNK AND ALL THAT DUUUURTTY SOUTH BULLSHIT MUSIC FULL OF WHISTLES AND WITH WHICH EVERY RAPPERS NAME STARTS WITH LIL'.
I ALSO DISLIKE TUPAC BUT I DO LIKE A COUPLE OF HIS ALBUMS
#234
Posted 20 September 2007 - 04:25 PM

If you love something, set it free. If it comes back, it's meant to be.
If not, point & laugh when it flies into a woodchipper.
#235
Posted 20 September 2007 - 06:03 PM
BUMP.
To all those who still think the Bugatti Veyron is the fastest production car, think again. The SSC Aero broke the record 2 days ago at a blazing 255.83 MPH!
Sloooow.0-60 mph time of just 2.78 seconds
The car is ugly too, and probably not as comfortable as the Veyron cause they want to save wait and stuff.

Courtesy to Connor
#236
Posted 20 September 2007 - 07:00 PM
#237
Posted 20 September 2007 - 07:05 PM
By 3rd generation, I presume you mean '82 & up?

If you love something, set it free. If it comes back, it's meant to be.
If not, point & laugh when it flies into a woodchipper.
#238
Posted 20 September 2007 - 07:06 PM
#239
Posted 20 September 2007 - 07:12 PM
And are you encouraging me to kill myself or something?
No, never. just encouraging you to put it together the way it should've been built in the first place.
I'll take a '73-'81 w/ a 400 & a six-pack intake w/ a 5-speed, black.

If you love something, set it free. If it comes back, it's meant to be.
If not, point & laugh when it flies into a woodchipper.
#240
Posted 20 September 2007 - 07:16 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
















